When Customer Service Blocks Leadership: A Wake-Up Call for Sri Lankan Banking

Customer service is not a desk, a department, or a call script. It is the voice and personality of an organization. In banking—an industry that thrives or fails on trust—every single interaction matters. When that interaction becomes a barrier instead of a bridge, the very foundation of customer confidence is shaken.

Recently, I experienced this firsthand with a leading private bank in Sri Lanka. I needed to urgently contact the CEO regarding a matter of significance. The phone numbers I had were outdated, so I called the hotline. After a short wait, I introduced myself and requested the number of the CEO’s office. Instead of assisting me, the representative insisted on knowing why I needed to speak with the CEO. I explained that such disclosure was unnecessary at her level and reminded her that calls were recorded for service quality. After another hold, I was eventually given the number.

This was not about the individual staff member. She was doing what the system had taught her. The real issue is the culture of hierarchy, rigidity, and misplaced “gatekeeping” that defines customer service in Sri Lankan banking. A simple request became an unnecessary hurdle, highlighting how far our service protocols are from global best practice.

Across Sri Lanka, customers face similar challenges daily—blocked transactions, remittance delays, outdated documentation, and excessive layers of approval. In many cases, telephone operators or customer service executives act as if they are making decisions on behalf of senior management, often worsening the situation instead of resolving it. This points to a structural issue: an industry where leadership hides behind layers of managers and staff who lack empowerment.

The Service Gap in Sri Lankan Banking

Sri Lanka’s banking sector is sizeable, with the Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL) reporting over 6.5 million active accounts and financial inclusion reaching 70% of the population. Yet, customer complaints remain high. According to CBSL’s 2023 Annual Report, banking-related consumer grievances accounted for nearly 38% of all financial sector complaints lodged.

At the same time, the non-performing loan (NPL) ratio in Sri Lanka hovers around 10%, reflecting not only financial stress but also inefficiencies in lending and customer relationship management. A 2022 KPMG study found that 67% of Sri Lankan SMEs felt banks were “slow and unhelpful” during loan and credit processes.

Globally, Deloitte reports that 62% of customers will abandon a provider after just two negative experiences. In Sri Lanka, where competition among banks is limited compared to markets like the UAE or Singapore, customers often feel trapped rather than valued.

Case Studies: Banking Service in Perspective

To illustrate the problem and the possible solutions, let us consider seven case studies drawn from Sri Lanka and abroad.

Case Study 1: Blocked Remittance (Sri Lanka)

A leading export company in Colombo faced severe cash flow issues when a multimillion-rupee inward remittance was blocked by their bank. Despite complying with all documentation, the funds were frozen for weeks due to “internal clearance procedures.” The hotline offered no clarity, and managers deferred responsibility. By the time the remittance was cleared, the company had missed supplier deadlines, losing contracts worth LKR 15 million.

Case Study 2: SME Loan Delays (Sri Lanka)

An SME owner in Kandy applied for a business expansion loan. The application went through six levels of approval—from customer service manager to AGM, DGM, GM, and finally to the credit committee. The process took four months. In contrast, fintech lenders in Singapore disburse SME loans within 48 hours using streamlined systems. The delay forced the SME to abandon their planned expansion.

Case Study 3: Resort Banking in the Maldives

In the Maldives, banks serving resorts understand that time is money. Senior managers are directly accessible to resort owners. Escalations are handled within 24 hours. This model not only builds trust but also positions banks as true business partners.

Case Study 4: Community Banking in Rwanda

Rwanda’s community banks empower frontline staff to approve micro-loans up to a threshold without senior management interference. This has enabled financial inclusion rates of 77%, one of the highest in Africa. Customers trust the system because staff are empowered to act, not merely defer.

Case Study 5: Priority Hotlines in the UAE

Several UAE banks operate dedicated CEO hotlines and escalation desks. High-value clients can directly access senior decision-makers. This accessibility has helped UAE banks maintain customer satisfaction scores above 80%, compared to Sri Lanka’s average of 52% (LMD Customer Satisfaction Index 2023).

Case Study 6: Shariah Banking in Saudi Arabia

Saudi banks operating under Shariah principles often involve senior leadership in customer relations to ensure compliance and build confidence. CEOs and COOs attend client meetings personally, reinforcing a culture of accountability.

Case Study 7: Cooperative Banking in Zanzibar

Zanzibar’s cooperative banking model minimizes hierarchy. Customers can walk into branch meetings where leadership is present. This openness builds trust in ways that scripted call centers never can.

Hierarchy as a Barrier

In Sri Lanka, the corporate ladder within banks is notoriously long:
Customer Service Executive → Customer Service Manager → Senior Manager → AGM → DGM → GM → COO → CEO.

At each level, accountability becomes diluted. Customer service representatives are trained to “filter” rather than “facilitate.” Managers often fear making decisions, preferring to escalate upward, where leadership remains insulated. The result is a culture where customers feel stonewalled rather than supported.

By contrast, in the UAE and Rwanda, banks have embraced flatter models, where empowered staff resolve 80% of issues at the first point of contact.

The Human Side of Banking

Banking is not just about transactions; it is about relationships. Customers seek not only efficiency but also empathy. A frontline staff member who is empowered to act can turn a potential conflict into a lasting relationship. Yet in Sri Lanka, customer service training is often reduced to scripted responses, with little room for emotional intelligence or discretion.

Globally, research shows that empowered employees drive customer loyalty. A PwC survey (2022) found that 82% of banking leaders identify customer trust as their biggest challenge, yet only 43% of employees feel empowered to solve customer problems. This mismatch is visible in Sri Lanka, where even simple requests become bureaucratic obstacles.

The Cost of Poor Customer Service

Poor customer service is not just an annoyance—it is an economic cost. Deloitte’s research shows that companies lose 25% of their customers annually due to poor service.

In Sri Lanka, consider this: with over 6.5 million bank accounts, even if 5% of customers shift banks due to service failures, that represents 325,000 lost relationships. If each account averages deposits or transactions of just LKR 100,000 annually, the system risks losing LKR 32.5 billion in value every year.

Solutions: Building a Service Culture

If Sri Lankan banks are to rebuild trust and align with global standards, several reforms are urgent:

Empower Frontline Staff
- Train CSRs to handle requests up to a defined threshold.
- Create decision-making authority at the branch level.
Leadership Accessibility
- Introduce CEO/COO hotlines or digital escalation desks.
- Ensure that customers with critical issues can bypass hierarchy.
Accountability Mechanisms
- Track and publish customer satisfaction KPIs.
- Make managers responsible for delays and unresolved complaints.
Balance Security with Service
- While data protection and compliance are vital, they should not be excuses for inefficiency. Secure systems must still be customer-friendly.
Technology with a Human Touch
- AI chatbots can handle routine tasks, but complex cases must escalate seamlessly to human decision-makers.

Conclusion

Banking is more than numbers—it is trust. A customer who feels dismissed, delayed, or blocked is a customer lost. Sri Lankan banks cannot afford to hide their leadership behind layers of hierarchy and scripted operators.

From my experiences across Sri Lanka, the Maldives, Zanzibar, Rwanda, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia, I have seen that excellent service cultures stand on three pillars:

✅ Respect for the customer
✅ Empowerment of staff
✅ Accountability at all levels

The Sri Lankan banking sector must embrace these principles urgently. Otherwise, customers will continue to see banks not as partners in growth, but as obstacles to overcome.

The ultimate question is simple: Are our systems designed to serve, or to shield?

Disclaimer

This article has been written and published in good faith by Dr. Dharshana Weerakoon, DBA (USA), drawing on publicly available data (Central Bank of Sri Lanka, international banking reports, and global service benchmarks) and decades of professional experience across multiple countries. It is intended purely for educational, journalistic, and public awareness purposes to stimulate discussion on customer service and leadership in banking.

The views expressed are the author’s own and do not constitute legal, financial, or investment advice, nor do they represent the views of any institution. The content complies with Sri Lankan law, including the Banking Act No. 30 of 1988, the Intellectual Property Act No. 52 of 1979, and the ICCPR Act No. 56 of 2007.

Further Reading: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/7046073343568977920/

Additional Reading: https://gray-magpie-132137.hostingersite.com/from-farm-to-blockchain-culinary-cryptocurrencies/